Do classic trading setups work on crypto? We graded ten, stage by stage

Published by vyx

The short answer

Not as trade signals: none of the ten setups we graded — from Wyckoff springs to the 80% rule — picked the direction of the next move after trading costs. Several are strong early warnings, though: when crowded longs got trapped, a flush followed 22–27% of the time, against 2.1–2.6% from a random moment.

10
setups built as stage machines and graded on 200 crypto markets, two windows each
0 of 10
called the direction of the move after a 10 bp round trip on both windows
22–27%
of the time a long flush followed Longs trapped, against 2.1–2.6% from a random moment
21–23%
of the time the 80% rule reached the far edge within 4 hours, against 27–32% from a random moment
The desk from this study

Open the strongest of the ten — Crowded → Trapped → Flush, both sides, live on 15-minute bars — or open any desk from the ranking below.

Open the desk

What a stage machine is

Most setups traders hunt are not one condition but a sequence. A Wyckoff spring is a dip under a range, then a quiet retest, then a breakout. A squeeze is compression, then a fire, then a run. We call that a stage machine: each stage is a screen that only lights once the stage before it has, so a market moves from stage 1 to stage 2 to stage 3 as the setup plays out. We built ten of them, one desk each, with every stage a plain rule that is either true or not.

How we graded them

Each desk promises a move: a flush, a breakout that keeps running, a bounce off a low, a trip across the value area. We asked one question of every stage: when it lit, how often did that move follow, compared with any random moment? A stage that lights before the move far more often than a random moment is a useful early warning. We graded every stage over 200 Hyperliquid crypto markets (120 for the order-book desk, whose data is heavier), on two separate windows of about 10 + 10 days ending 22 October 2026.

  • Two chance checks on every stage: the same lit moments slid onto other markets at the same times, and onto other days at the same time of day. A stage only counts as real when it beats both — otherwise it is the whole market moving together, or the time of day.
  • Direction measured separately: did trading the stage in its own direction make money after a 10 bp round trip, on both windows?
  • 41 stages and variations graded in all, every one on both windows — the failures are reported beside the winners.

The ten desks, ranked as early warnings

the move followed, when the stage lit the move followed, from a random moment stage is partly the move itself
  1. 01

    Crowded → Trapped → Flush

    Strong

    Traders pile into one side (funding in the market’s top 10%, open interest up 5%), price breaks against them on a big sweep, then they are forced out.

    When it lit, the move followed about 11× as often as from a random moment.
    22–27%
    2.1–2.6%

    Stage read: Longs trapped (15-minute bars). The move: a 3% drop inside an hour with open interest down 2% (longs forced out), within the next 4 hours.

    The mirror works too: when Shorts trapped lit, a squeeze followed 5–6.7% of the time against 0.7–0.8%. Which way price went after the flush changed between the two windows.

    Open the Crowded → Trapped → Flush desk
  2. 02

    Ignition → Follow-through → Holding

    Strong

    A huge buy sweep on a bar three times its usual size, moving on its own rather than with Bitcoin; then new positions follow; then the spike holds.

    When it lit, the move followed about 7× as often as from a random moment.
    14–16%
    1.7–2.4%

    Stage read: Spike ignition (15-minute bars). The move: a new 24-hour high that runs 3% further, within the next 3 hours.

    Requiring the spike to move apart from Bitcoin is what makes it: without that condition the same spike read 5×. Bought on the spike and held 15h, it made money after costs on one window and lost on the other, so it is not a buy signal.

    Open the Ignition → Follow-through → Holding desk
  3. 03

    Absorption → Initiative

    Strong

    Sellers hit a low and price won’t go lower; the sellers run out while trapped longs exit; then buyers take over on a big buy sweep.

    When it lit, the move followed about 7× as often as from a random moment.
    5–8.8%
    0.8–1.1%

    Stage read: Buyers take over (15-minute bars). The move: a bounce off a 12-hour low that breaks out and runs 2% further, within the next 2 hours.

    Each stage sharpens the one before: stage 1 2.0×, stage 2 5×, stage 3 7×. On hourly bars the last stage read 5×.

    Open the Absorption → Initiative desk
  4. 04

    Held Up → BTC Steadies → Leader Breaks

    Useful

    A market holds its price while Bitcoin dumps, Bitcoin steadies, then the market that held up breaks out first.

    When it lit, the move followed about 3× as often as from a random moment.
    14–32%
    6.8–7.5%

    Stage read: Leader breaks out (15-minute bars). The move: a breakout above the last 6 hours’ high that runs 2% further, within the next 3 hours.

    Holding up in a Bitcoin dump on its own read 1.2×. The last stage is itself a breakout, so part of its number is the move it is graded against; Bitcoin dumps are rare, so the desk is quiet most days.

    Open the Held Up → BTC Steadies → Leader Breaks desk
  5. 05

    Squeeze → Fire → Run

    Useful

    Volatility compresses for six bars (Bollinger Bands inside the Keltner Channel), price breaks the 5-hour high, then the break holds.

    When it lit, the move followed about 3× as often as from a random moment.
    22–23%
    6.8–7.5%

    Stage read: Squeeze fired (15-minute bars). The move: a breakout above the last 6 hours’ high that runs 2% further, within the next 3 hours.

    The squeeze on its own read 1.2× and is on in 8.9–10% of all bars. Requiring buying and new open interest on the break did not help (3×).

    Open the Squeeze → Fire → Run desk
  6. 06

    Sweep → Change of Character → Gap

    Useful

    The Smart Money Concepts sequence: stops under a swing low are taken, a big candle breaks the last swing high and leaves a gap, then price comes back into the gap.

    When it lit, the move followed about 2.7× as often as from a random moment.
    17–22%
    6.8–7.5%

    Stage read: Character changed (15-minute bars). The move: a breakout above the last 6 hours’ high that runs 2% further, within the next 3 hours.

    The change of character carries the read. The stop sweep on its own read 0.8×, and coming back into the gap 1.7×.

    Open the Sweep → Change of Character → Gap desk
  7. 07

    Holy Grail Pullback

    Weak

    Linda Raschke’s Holy Grail: a fresh 24-hour high, the first pullback to the 20 EMA, then a break of the pullback’s high after traders took profit in the pullback.

    When it lit, the move followed about 1.9× as often as from a random moment.
    13–14%
    6.8–7.5%

    Stage read: Trend resumes (15-minute bars). The move: a breakout above the last 6 hours’ high that runs 2% further, within the next 3 hours.

    The pullback adds nothing: the fresh 24-hour high on its own read 2.9×, the textbook pullback to the 20 EMA 0.6× and the break of its high 1.9× — with or without falling open interest (1.7× without).

    Open the Holy Grail Pullback desk
  8. 08

    Wyckoff Spring → Test → Strength

    Weak

    A dip under a trading range that snaps back (the spring), a quiet retest of that low, then a breakout on heavy volume.

    When it lit, the move followed about 2.6× as often as from a random moment.
    16–20%
    6.8–7.5%

    Stage read: SOS breakout (15-minute bars). The move: a breakout above the last 6 hours’ high that runs 2% further, within the next 3 hours.

    The spring read 0.5× and the test 0.7×: both came before rallies less often than from a random moment. Only the breakout scores, and it is partly the move itself.

    Open the Wyckoff Spring → Test → Strength desk
  9. 09

    Fake Wall → Pulled → Lift

    Weak

    A big sell wall held by one or two orders pins price, the wall disappears without being bought, then price lifts through.

    When it lit, the move followed about 1.5× as often as from a random moment.
    4.1–7.2%
    3.5–4.2%

    Stage read: Lifts through (5-minute bars). The move: a breakout above the last 2 hours’ high that runs 2% further within 80 minutes, inside the next hour.

    The wall read 0.7× and its disappearance 0.6×: on 5-minute bars a wall that was cancelled looks the same as one that was traded into, so the setup can’t be told apart from noise yet.

    Open the Fake Wall → Pulled → Lift desk
  10. 10

    80% Rule

    Fails

    The Market Profile rule: price falls under the last 24 hours’ value area, comes back in and stays two bars, and is said to travel to the top 80% of the time.

    When it lit, the move followed less often than from a random moment.
    21–23%
    27–32%

    Stage read: Accepted in value (15-minute bars). The move: price reaches the top of the last day’s value area, within the next 4 hours.

    Given a whole 12 hours, it reached the top 46–54% of the time against 53–61% from a random moment — still a little less often.

    Open the 80% Rule desk
How much more often the move followed, desk by desk

Each desk’s ranked stage on the two windows: how many times more often its move followed when the stage lit than from a random moment. 1× is no better than chance. The strong three held on both windows; the last bar is the 80% rule, below 1× on both.

The numbers
Oct 2 – Oct 12Oct 12 – Oct 22
Longs trapped (Crowded)10.4×10.7×
Spike ignition (Ignition)6.7×8.2×
Buyers take over (Absorption)6.3×8.0×
Leader breaks out (Held Up)1.9×4.7×
Squeeze fired (Squeeze)2.9×3.4×
Character changed (Sweep)2.3×3.2×
Trend resumes (Holy Grail Pullback)1.9×1.9×
SOS breakout (Wyckoff Spring)2.2×3.0×
Lifts through (Fake Wall)2.1×1.0×
Accepted in value (80% Rule)0.7×0.8×

The strongest early warnings

Crowded → Trapped → Flush, Ignition → Follow-through → Holding, Absorption → Initiative are the three to watch. Crowded longs that get trapped are the clearest read in the study: the setup is rare, but when it lit, the flush followed 22–27% of the time against 2.1–2.6%. A spike ignition — a buy sweep in the market’s top 3% on a bar three times its usual range, moving on its own — came before a fresh 24-hour high that ran 3% further 14–16% of the time, against 1.7–2.4%. And Absorption → Initiative is the one desk where every stage sharpens the last, on 15-minute bars and on hourly bars alike.

Each stage sharpens the warning: Absorption → Initiative

How often a V-turn followed (a bounce off a 12-hour low that breaks out and runs 2%), averaged over the two windows, at each stage. The random rate barely moves; the hit rate climbs with every stage — and the setup lights less often as it goes.

The numbers
The move followed, when the stage litFrom a random moment
Stage 1: Absorbed at the low1.9%1.0%
Stage 2: Sellers run out4.3%1.0%
Stage 3: Buyers take over6.9%1.0%
A warning, not a direction

Not one of the ten desks made money traded in its own direction after a 10 bp round trip on both windows. The desks that warn best tell you a market is about to move — not which way. Read a lit market as “look here now”, never as “buy”.

Traded in its own direction, after costs

Each ranked stage traded in its own direction and held 15h (5h for the order-book desk), after a 10 bp round trip, in basis points per trade. Below zero lost money. Where the two windows disagree in sign, the direction is noise.

The numbers
Oct 2 – Oct 12Oct 12 – Oct 22
Longs trapped−33 bp+65 bp
Spike ignition+15 bp−140 bp
Buyers take over−17 bp+1.5 bp
Leader breaks out−36 bp−207 bp
Squeeze fired−7.4 bp−20 bp
Character changed+4.1 bp−25 bp
Trend resumes−57 bp−43 bp
SOS breakout+88 bp−19 bp
Lifts through−24 bp−15 bp
Accepted in value+13 bp−4.2 bp

What didn’t work

Some of the most taught setups did not survive the grade on crypto.

  • The 80% rule. After price came back into the value area and stayed, it reached the top within 4 hours 21–23% of the time — against 27–32% from a random moment. Given 12 hours, 46–54% against 53–61%.
  • The Wyckoff spring and its test. They came before a rally less often than from a random moment (0.5× for the spring, 0.5–0.8× for the test).
  • The textbook Holy Grail pullback. 0.6× — its pullbacks came before rallies less often than from a random moment. The rally came back only once price broke the pullback’s high, and even then less often than straight after the fresh high itself.
  • A stop sweep on its own. Taking the stops under a swing low read 0.8×; the change of character after it is what carries the Smart Money Concepts desk.
  • Order-book walls on 5-minute bars. A thin-held wall read 0.7× and its disappearance 0.6× — our book data can’t yet tell a pulled wall from a filled one.
The 80% rule against a random moment

How often price reached the top of the last 24 hours’ value area after the rule’s signal (back inside value, held two bars), against any random moment, averaged over the two windows. The rule did worse than chance within 4 hours, and still a little worse within 12.

The numbers
After the rule’s signalFrom a random moment
Within 4 hours22%30%
Within 12 hours50%57%
Why four desks look better than they are

On four desks the last stage is itself a breakout — the same thing the desk is graded against. A stage that lights on the move scores partly because it is the move. Their bars are striped in the ranking, and we weighed their earlier stages when ranking them.

What we’re building next

Building these ten desks showed us exactly where the tools fall short for setups like these. What we’re building, so the next round of this study is sharper and so you can build your own:

  • Grade a setup on the whole market, and keep a desk to the markets it was graded on — so any rare setup gets a real verdict, and a crypto desk shows only crypto.
  • Grade a setup as a trade — enter on the last stage, stop at a level an earlier stage set, a target and a time limit, after costs, against a random market at the same moment.
  • See which stage every market has reached — rank a desk by the furthest stage reached and how recently, colour a stage without calling it a buy or a sell, and alert only on the last stage.
  • Build stage machines faster — grade a whole chain in one step before saving it, write both sides of a setup at once, and use windows like “since stage 1” instead of a fixed number of bars.
  • A session clock — time of day and session in formulas, for opening-range breakouts, prior-day levels and the 80% rule as it was written.
  • Tell a pulled order from a filled one in the order book, so spoofing and pulled-wall setups can be tested at all.
  • Fewer sharp edges — a warning when two screens share a name, and lists that show only the markets actually firing.

We’ll re-run this study when these ship — stay tuned.

How this was done

The same method as every study here — how vyx tests a signal.

Venue and markets
Hyperliquid perpetuals: the 200 most-traded crypto markets (120 for the order-book desk), the same list on both windows.
Bars and windows
15-minute bars (5-minute for the order-book desk), 1,000 bars a window (800 for the order-book desk). Two windows that never overlap: Oct 2 – Oct 12 and Oct 12 – Oct 22, 2026. Absorption → Initiative was also graded on hourly bars.
What counts
Each desk is graded against the move it promises, defined on the chart before looking at results. A stage counts as early when it lit within the bars before the move (one to four hours, by desk).
The hit rate
The share of the times a stage switched on that the move followed, beside the share of random market-bars with the move just ahead.
Chance
Each stage’s lit moments slid onto other markets at the same candles and onto other days at the same time of day, many times over. A stage counts as real only when it beats both.
Direction
The excess return of each stage traded in its own direction, after a 10 bp taker round trip, at several holding times, on both windows.
Ideas tried
41 stages and variations, every one graded on both windows and reported.
Reproduce
The study re-runs on request on the same pinned windows; every desk opens live from this page.

What it does not show

  • Two windows of about ten days each is short, and both sit in one market regime.
  • Today’s most-traded markets, graded backwards: markets that faded or delisted are not in the sample.
  • Events, not trades: the hit rates say how often a move followed, not what a bracket order around it would have made.
  • Nine of the ten desks were built bull side only; the crowding desk is the one graded on both sides.
  • The 80% rule was tested on a rolling 24-hour value area, not the prior session’s, and the order-book desk on per-bar book data that can’t separate cancelled from filled size.

Questions

What is a stage machine in trading?

A setup written as a sequence of conditions, each one only counting once the one before it has happened — for example a spring, then a test, then a breakout. Each stage is a screen; a market moves through the stages as the setup plays out.

Does the 80% rule work on crypto?

Not in our test. After price came back into the last day’s value area and held, it reached the far edge within 4 hours 21–23% of the time, against 27–32% from a random moment, and still a little less often than chance within 12 hours.

Does the Wyckoff spring work on crypto?

Not as a lead on 15-minute bars. Springs came before a rally less often than from a random moment on both windows, and so did the test of the spring. Only the final breakout scored, and it is partly the breakout itself.

Which setup gives the earliest warning of a move?

In our grade: trapped crowded traders (a flush followed 22–27% of the time against 2.1–2.6%), a spike ignition, and absorption at a low followed by buyers taking over. None of them says which way price goes next.

Can order flow predict the direction of crypto prices?

Not in these ten setups. Order flow — sweeps, open interest, funding — made the best early warnings of a move, but traded in its own direction no desk cleared a 10 bp round trip on both windows.

Watch it on today’s board

Open the strongest of the ten — Crowded → Trapped → Flush, both sides, live on 15-minute bars — or open any desk from the ranking below.

Open the desk

Free, no install. Or grade your own signal the same way — how vyx tests a signal.

Get new research by email

One email when a new study lands or a study is re-run on fresh data. Nothing else, and one click to leave.

Your address is used for this and nothing else. Privacy

Related